Debate BMKG vs AccuWeather It has long been a warm topic among users of Indonesian weather apps. They both provide weather forecasts for Indonesia, but they use different approaches and sources of data. This article compares BMKG vs AccuWeather Deeply so that you can choose the service that suits the most.
A glimpse of BMKG and AccuWeather
BMKG is officially in charge of national weather information. Standing since 1866, BMKG operates over 200 weather stations throughout Indonesia. Therefore, the BMKG has local observation data that no international service has.
AccuWeather is a private United States company that's been standing since 1962. Currently AccuWeather serves over 1.5 billion users worldwide. The service uses a proprietary weather prediction model and claims predictive accuracy for the next 90 days. However, that claim is still debated by the international meteorological community.
BMKG vs AccuWeather comparison
Here's a complete table of comparison between BMKG and AccuWeather for Indonesian users.
| Aspek | BMKG | AccuWeather |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | Indonesia (Government) | United States (Private) |
| Stand up | 1866 | 1962 |
| October Indonesia | Entire region to dignity | Big city |
| Local Data Source | 200 + weather station Indonesia | Global model only |
| Daily Preview | 3 days (details) + 7 days | 15 days (MinuteCast) |
| Extreme Warning | Official and legal for Indonesia | It's not official for Indonesia |
| Language | Indonesian | English (automatic translation) |
| Mobile Application | InfoBMKG (free) | AccuWeather (freemium) |
| API for Developer | Limited | Pays available |
| Price | Free | Free (with advertising) |
BMKG vs AccuWeather accuracy for Indonesia
In terms of accuracy for the Indonesian region, BMKG is generally superior to remote areas and islands. This is because BMKG has a local observation station that provides actual data from those points. As a result, BMKG forecasts for areas like Papua, Maluku, and Southeast Nusa tend to be more accurate than AccuWeather.
Instead, AccuWeather is often more accurate to cities such as Jakarta, Surabaya and Bali. Besides, AccuWeather has a MinuteCast feature that predicts rain per minute. — features that BMKG doesn't have.
BMKG quality
BMKG has some unique advantages that AccuWeather cannot support for the Indonesian context. First, the BMKG forecast covers the entire region of Indonesia to the degree of achievement. — Something that's impossible, a global AccuWeather model. Second, early warning of the extreme BMKG weather is official and the local government is referring to the evacuation decision.
Third, BMKG provides real-time earthquake and tsunami information — Critical features that aren't in AccuWeather. Fourth, all BMKG services are available for free without advertising via the official bmkg.go.id website and InfoBMKG applications.
AccuWeather Excellency
AccuWeather is superior in some aspects that the BMKG doesn't have. First, the AccuWeather user interface is much more modern and easier to use than the InfoBMKG app. Second, the MinuteCast AccuWeather feature predicts when exactly the rain will start and stop in the next 120 minutes. — Very useful for short-term planning.
Third, AccuWeather provides weather forecasts for the next 15 days, longer than a 30-7 BMKG. Although the predictive accuracy of 10-15 days is still limited, it's useful for mid-term travel planning. Moreover, AccuWeather is available in many languages and has a more mature ecosystem of applications.
Which one should I use?
The best answer is to use them as you need them. Use BMKG as a primary source for extreme weather warnings, earthquake information, and remote premise. Meanwhile, use AccuWeather for a more comfortable interface and a MinuteCast feature while in the big city.
As a third alternative, Cuaca.in using Open-Meteo data based ECMWF model recognized as the most accurate global weather model. It's available in Indonesian with a simpler and understandable view. Check too 7-day forecast and Extreme weather warning For complete information.
